Century Communities vs KB Home
CCS and KBH side by side, both in operative builders. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CCS and KBH compare
KB Home is the larger company, worth 2.0 times as much as Century Communities ($2.9B against $1.5B).
On earnings, Century Communities is cheaper: it trades at 11.5× trailing earnings, against 13.5× for KB Home.
Century Communities grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−8.9% versus −20.8% for KB Home).
KB Home keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 4.4% compared with 3.4% at Century Communities.
Both pay dividends: Century Communities yields 2.4% and KB Home 2.1%.
KB Home scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 9 for Century Communities), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CCS | KBH |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $1.5B | $2.9B |
| Share price | $52.59 | $47.94 |
| Change, 1 year | −14.1% | −23.6% |
| Change, 5 years | −24.4% | 13.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.04 | 1.06 |
| Employees | 484 | 1,200 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 | 10 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Health score | 4 | 4 |
| Dividend score | 2 | 2 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 11.5× (better) | 13.5× |
| P/S | 0.4× (better) | 0.6× |
| P/B | 0.6× (better) | 0.8× |
| EV/EBITDA | 7.0× | – |
| P/FCF | 42.7× (better) | 103× |
| FCF yield | 2.3% (better) | 0.98% |
| Fair value | $49.80 | $54.73 |
| Margin of safety | −5.6% | 12.4% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −8.9% (better) | −20.8% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.4% | 8.3% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −48.5% (better) | −56.1% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −44.3% (better) | −50.1% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −4.5% | 14.5% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Net margin | 3.4% | 4.4% (better) |
| FCF margin | 0.89% (better) | 0.55% |
| Return on equity | 5.2% | 5.9% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.93 (better) | 1.92 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.4% (better) | 2.1% |
| Payout ratio | 26.5% | 27.9% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 3 |
| Buyback yield | 6.7% | 9.6% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 9.0% | 11.7% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 92.7% | 104% |
| Held by insiders | 15.1% | 4.7% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$7.3M (better) | −$19.1M |
| Short interest, % of float | 7.8% | 16.2% |
Go deeper
- CCS stock overview
- CCS income statement
- CCS valuation and score
- KBH stock overview
- KBH income statement
- KBH valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.