Century Communities vs Hovnanian Enterprises
CCS and HOV side by side, both in operative builders. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CCS and HOV compare
Century Communities is the larger company, worth 2.5 times as much as Hovnanian Enterprises ($1.5B against $592M).
On earnings, Century Communities is cheaper: it trades at 11.5× trailing earnings, against 112× for Hovnanian Enterprises.
Century Communities grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−8.9% versus −10.1% for Hovnanian Enterprises).
Century Communities pays a dividend yielding 2.4%; Hovnanian Enterprises does not pay one.
Century Communities scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 6 for Hovnanian Enterprises), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CCS | HOV |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $1.5B | $592M |
| Share price | $52.59 | $99.41 |
| Change, 1 year | −14.1% | −21.1% |
| Change, 5 years | −24.4% | 11.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.04 | 2.11 |
| Employees | 484 | 1,891 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 (better) | 6 |
| Valuation score | 2 | 2 |
| Growth score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 4 | 4 |
| Dividend score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 11.5× (better) | 112× |
| P/S | 0.4× | 0.2× (better) |
| P/B | 0.6× (better) | 0.7× |
| EV/EBITDA | 7.0× (better) | 15.6× |
| P/FCF | 42.7× | 3.0× (better) |
| FCF yield | 2.3% | 33.4% (better) |
| Fair value | $49.80 | $105.61 |
| Margin of safety | −5.6% | 5.9% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −8.9% (better) | −10.1% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.4% (better) | 4.9% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −48.5% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −44.3% (better) | −95.7% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −4.5% | 1.1% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Net margin | 3.4% | – |
| FCF margin | 0.89% | 7.0% (better) |
| Return on equity | 5.2% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.93 (better) | 1.23 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | – |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.4% | – |
| Payout ratio | 26.5% | – |
| Buyback yield | 6.7% (better) | 3.1% |
| Shareholder yield | 9.0% (better) | 3.1% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 92.7% | 56.1% |
| Held by insiders | 15.1% | 26.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$7.3M | −$1.8M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 7.8% | – |
Go deeper
- CCS stock overview
- CCS income statement
- CCS valuation and score
- HOV stock overview
- HOV income statement
- HOV valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.