Century Communities vs Dream Finders Homes
CCS and DFH side by side, both in operative builders. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CCS and DFH compare
Century Communities is the larger company, worth 1.7 times as much as Dream Finders Homes ($1.5B against $899M).
On earnings, Dream Finders Homes is cheaper: it trades at 7.0× trailing earnings, against 11.5× for Century Communities.
Century Communities grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−8.9% versus −12.2% for Dream Finders Homes).
Dream Finders Homes keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 3.5% compared with 3.4% at Century Communities.
Century Communities pays a dividend yielding 2.4%; Dream Finders Homes does not pay one.
Dream Finders Homes scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 9 for Century Communities), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CCS | DFH |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $1.5B | $899M |
| Share price | $52.59 | $9.79 |
| Change, 1 year | −14.1% | −54.7% |
| Change, 5 years | −24.4% | −39.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.04 | 1.34 |
| Employees | 484 | 1,911 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 | 11 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 | 6 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Health score | 4 | 4 |
| Dividend score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 11.5× | 7.0× (better) |
| P/S | 0.4× | 0.2× (better) |
| P/B | 0.6× (better) | 0.6× |
| EV/EBITDA | 7.0× | 3.3× (better) |
| P/FCF | 42.7× | – |
| FCF yield | 2.3% (better) | −18.0% |
| Fair value | $49.80 | $17.58 |
| Margin of safety | −5.6% | 44.3% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −8.9% (better) | −12.2% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.4% | 30.7% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −48.5% (better) | −52.9% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −44.3% (better) | −54.1% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −4.5% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Net margin | 3.4% | 3.5% (better) |
| FCF margin | 0.89% (better) | −3.9% |
| Return on equity | 5.2% | 10.6% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.93 (better) | 1.70 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 (better) | 2 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.4% | – |
| Payout ratio | 26.5% | – |
| Buyback yield | 6.7% (better) | 5.8% |
| Shareholder yield | 9.0% (better) | 5.8% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 92.7% | 33.8% |
| Held by insiders | 15.1% | 71.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$7.3M (better) | −$8.8M |
| Short interest, % of float | 7.8% | 33.7% |
Go deeper
- CCS stock overview
- CCS income statement
- CCS valuation and score
- DFH stock overview
- DFH income statement
- DFH valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.