Cogent Communications vs Iridium Communications
CCOI and IRDM side by side, both in communications. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CCOI and IRDM compare
Iridium Communications is the larger company, worth 14 times as much as Cogent Communications ($4.8B against $345M).
Iridium Communications grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (3.1% versus −4.5% for Cogent Communications).
Iridium Communications keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 10.5% compared with −4.7% at Cogent Communications.
Both pay dividends: Cogent Communications yields 1.2% and Iridium Communications 1.3%.
Iridium Communications scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 10 for Cogent Communications), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CCOI | IRDM |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $345M | $4.8B |
| Share price | $6.74 | $44.91 |
| Change, 1 year | −84.3% | 165% |
| Change, 5 years | −91.1% | 4.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.66 | 0.68 |
| Employees | 1,833 | 975 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 | 13 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 51.0× |
| P/S | 0.4× (better) | 5.4× |
| P/B | – | 10.1× |
| EV/EBITDA | 0.5× (better) | 10.8× |
| P/FCF | – | 16.5× |
| PEG | – | 0.35 |
| FCF yield | −41.4% | 6.1% (better) |
| Fair value | – | $31.24 |
| Margin of safety | – | −43.8% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −4.5% | 3.1% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 11.4% (better) | 8.4% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −17.6% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −11.1% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 46.3% | – |
| Operating margin | 8.0% | 23.8% (better) |
| Net margin | −4.7% | 10.5% (better) |
| FCF margin | −14.9% | 32.6% (better) |
| Return on equity | −722% | 19.7% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | – | 47.0% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.00 |
| Current ratio | 0.63 | 2.78 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 0.01 | 1.88 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 8 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.2% | 1.3% (better) |
| Payout ratio | – | 103% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 1.9% | – |
| Buyback yield | – | 1.1% |
| Shareholder yield | 1.2% | 2.4% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 92.3% | 86.1% |
| Held by insiders | 7.1% | 22.9% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$996K (better) | −$19.8M |
| Short interest, % of float | 12.6% | 4.1% |
Go deeper
- CCOI stock overview
- CCOI income statement
- CCOI valuation and score
- IRDM stock overview
- IRDM income statement
- IRDM valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.