CareCloud vs NetSol Technologies
CCLD and NTWK side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CCLD and NTWK compare
CareCloud is the larger company, worth 1.4 times as much as NetSol Technologies ($113M against $82.4M).
On earnings, CareCloud is cheaper: it trades at 20.4× trailing earnings, against 27.6× for NetSol Technologies.
CareCloud grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (14.9% versus 6.9% for NetSol Technologies).
CareCloud keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 7.4% compared with 3.8% at NetSol Technologies.
NetSol Technologies scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 12 for CareCloud), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CCLD | NTWK |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $113M | $82.4M |
| Share price | $2.65 | $6.89 |
| Change, 1 year | −21.4% | 68.0% |
| Change, 5 years | −63.1% | 46.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.42 | 0.69 |
| Employees | 3,300 | 1,370 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 12 | 15 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 4 | 4 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 20.4× (better) | 27.6× |
| P/S | 0.9× (better) | 1.1× |
| P/B | 5.0× | 2.0× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 3.9× (better) | 7.8× |
| P/FCF | 5.2× (better) | 6.9× |
| FCF yield | 19.2% (better) | 14.4% |
| Fair value | $4.97 | $8.14 |
| Margin of safety | 46.7% (better) | 15.4% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 14.9% (better) | 6.9% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 2.8% | 7.3% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −13.8% | 0.93% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 225% (better) | 0.00% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 10.8% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 50.1% |
| Operating margin | 9.6% (better) | 8.9% |
| Net margin | 7.4% (better) | 3.8% |
| FCF margin | 16.5% (better) | 15.2% |
| Return on equity | 24.0% (better) | 7.4% |
| Return on invested capital | 33.8% (better) | 24.6% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.01 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | −3.27 |
| Current ratio | 0.87 | 2.06 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.18 | 2.81 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 22.5% | 17.1% |
| Held by insiders | 5.4% | 20.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $0 (better) | −$51.4K |
| Short interest, % of float | 1.7% | 1.3% |
Go deeper
- CCLD stock overview
- CCLD income statement
- CCLD valuation and score
- NTWK stock overview
- NTWK income statement
- NTWK valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.