Crown vs O-I Glass
CCK and OI side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CCK and OI compare
Crown is the larger company, worth 17 times as much as O-I Glass ($13.0B against $751M).
Crown grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (13.4% versus −1.9% for O-I Glass).
Crown keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 5.8% compared with −18.9% at O-I Glass.
Crown pays a dividend yielding 0.87%; O-I Glass does not pay one.
Crown scores higher on the StockData Score (18 against 5 for O-I Glass), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CCK | OI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $13.0B | $751M |
| Share price | $120.48 | $4.88 |
| Change, 1 year | 20.3% | −62.7% |
| Change, 5 years | 8.0% | −56.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.64 | 1.09 |
| Employees | 23K | 19K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 18 (better) | 5 |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 16.8× | – |
| P/S | 0.9× | 0.1× (better) |
| P/B | 4.4× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 11.4× | 9.6× (better) |
| P/FCF | 12.9× | – |
| PEG | 7.90 | – |
| FCF yield | 7.8% (better) | −5.9% |
| Fair value | $139.57 | $8.64 |
| Margin of safety | 13.7% | 43.5% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 13.4% (better) | −1.9% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.7% (better) | 1.1% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −16.0% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −11.1% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 8.2% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 20.2% (better) | 13.2% |
| Operating margin | 12.0% | – |
| Net margin | 5.8% (better) | −18.9% |
| FCF margin | 7.3% (better) | −0.69% |
| Return on equity | 26.7% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 15.1% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.99 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 3.18 (better) | 8.21 |
| Interest coverage | 4.2× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.14 | 1.28 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.06 (better) | 0.93 |
| Piotroski F-score | 8 (better) | 7 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.87% | – |
| Payout ratio | 18.2% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 4 | – |
| Buyback yield | 6.1% (better) | 2.7% |
| Shareholder yield | 6.9% (better) | 2.7% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 100.0% | 103% |
| Held by insiders | 0.97% | 1.8% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$16.5M | $279K (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 3 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.1% | 11.9% |
Go deeper
- CCK stock overview
- CCK income statement
- CCK valuation and score
- OI stock overview
- OI income statement
- OI valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.