StockData

Cameco vs Uranium Energy

CCJ and UEC side by side, both in materials. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How CCJ and UEC compare

Cameco grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (11.0% versus −44.3% for Uranium Energy).

Cameco keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 16.9% compared with −369% at Uranium Energy.

Cameco scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 6 for Uranium Energy), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricCCJUEC
Size and price
Market cap–$3.8B
Share price$76.91$7.71
Change, 1 year−27.9%−50.5%
Change, 5 years185%68.3%
Beta (5Y)1.241.57
Employees–257
StockData Score
Total score11 (better)6
Valuation score01 (better)
Growth score3 (better)1
Performance score3 (better)2
Health score5 (better)2
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S–103×
P/B–2.8×
FCF yield–−2.8%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)11.0% (better)−44.3%
Revenue growth, 5Y average14.1%–
Net income growth (TTM)243%–
EPS growth (TTM)246%–
Profitability
Gross margin27.9%45.4% (better)
Operating margin17.8% (better)−357%
Net margin16.9% (better)−369%
FCF margin30.9% (better)−288%
Return on equity8.9% (better)−11.6%
Return on invested capital6.8% (better)−12.3%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.14–
Net debt / EBITDA−0.13–
Interest coverage5.4× (better)−64.3×
Current ratio2.4717.26 (better)
Altman Z-score–16.51
Piotroski F-score9 (better)4
Dividends and buybacks
Payout ratio17.7%–
Buyback yield–−13.9%
Shareholder yield–−13.9%
Ownership
Held by institutions63.4%83.1%
Held by insiders0.00%1.7%
Short interest, % of float–12.5%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.