Cracker Barrel Old Country Store vs Texas Roadhouse
CBRL and TXRH side by side, both in eating and drinking places. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CBRL and TXRH compare
Texas Roadhouse is the larger company, worth 7.7 times as much as Cracker Barrel Old Country Store ($12.0B against $1.6B).
On earnings, Texas Roadhouse is cheaper: it trades at 29.2× trailing earnings, against 50.0× for Cracker Barrel Old Country Store.
Texas Roadhouse grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (9.9% versus −4.7% for Cracker Barrel Old Country Store).
Both pay dividends: Cracker Barrel Old Country Store yields 1.4% and Texas Roadhouse 1.6%.
Texas Roadhouse scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 5 for Cracker Barrel Old Country Store), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CBRL | TXRH |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $1.6B | $12.0B |
| Share price | $70.05 | $182.52 |
| Change, 1 year | 102% | 6.8% |
| Change, 5 years | −52.0% | 90.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.05 | 0.75 |
| Employees | 75K | 101K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 5 | 11 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Health score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 50.0× | 29.2× (better) |
| P/S | 0.5× (better) | 1.9× |
| P/B | 3.3× (better) | 7.7× |
| EV/EBITDA | 16.9× | 16.8× (better) |
| P/FCF | 17.7× (better) | 29.5× |
| PEG | – | 1.90 |
| FCF yield | 5.6% (better) | 3.4% |
| Fair value | $42.42 | $153.81 |
| Margin of safety | −65.1% | −18.7% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −4.7% | 9.9% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 3.3% | 19.6% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −31.7% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −32.0% | −4.6% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −33.4% | 68.4% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 69.1% | – |
| Operating margin | −0.38% | 7.7% (better) |
| Net margin | 0.95% | – |
| FCF margin | 2.7% | 6.5% (better) |
| Return on equity | 6.7% | – |
| Return on invested capital | −1.5% | 31.2% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.71 | 0.03 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.72 (better) | −0.22 |
| Current ratio | 0.58 (better) | 0.46 |
| Altman Z-score | 2.43 | 6.02 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | – |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.4% | 1.6% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 73.1% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 0.00% | 49.8% (better) |
| Buyback yield | – | 1.4% |
| Shareholder yield | 1.4% | 3.0% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 100% | 99.1% |
| Held by insiders | 17.3% | 0.53% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$17.3M | −$9.9M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 28.6% | 3.5% |
Go deeper
- CBRL stock overview
- CBRL income statement
- CBRL valuation and score
- TXRH stock overview
- TXRH income statement
- TXRH valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.