Chain Bridge Bancorp vs National Bank
CBNA and NBHC side by side, both in commercial banks. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CBNA and NBHC compare
National Bank is the larger company, worth 4.8 times as much as Chain Bridge Bancorp ($1.7B against $346M).
On earnings, Chain Bridge Bancorp is cheaper: it trades at 10.6× trailing earnings, against 15.7× for National Bank.
Chain Bridge Bancorp grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (41.5% versus 7.3% for National Bank).
National Bank keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 203% compared with 43.9% at Chain Bridge Bancorp.
National Bank pays a dividend yielding 3.4%; Chain Bridge Bancorp does not pay one.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CBNA | NBHC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $346M | $1.7B |
| Share price | $52.77 | $37.35 |
| Change, 1 year | 74.2% | 0.73% |
| Change, 5 years | – | −17.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.74 | 0.68 |
| Employees | 84 | 1,302 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 11 | 11 |
| Valuation score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 10.6× (better) | 15.7× |
| P/S | 4.6× (better) | 34.3× |
| P/B | 1.8× | 1.0× (better) |
| P/FCF | 14.6× | – |
| PEG | – | 1.68 |
| FCF yield | 6.8% | – |
| Fair value | $45.98 | $37.85 |
| Margin of safety | −14.8% | 1.3% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 41.5% (better) | 7.3% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 7.8% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 76.3% (better) | −17.5% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 74.8% (better) | −23.2% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 0.00% |
| Profitability | ||
| Net margin | 43.9% | 203% (better) |
| FCF margin | 31.7% | – |
| Return on equity | 18.5% (better) | 6.5% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Altman Z-score | 0.21 (better) | 0.16 |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 3.4% |
| Payout ratio | – | 53.3% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 9 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 8.4% |
| Buyback yield | – | 2.3% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 5.7% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 33.5% | 92.6% |
| Held by insiders | 32.2% | 8.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$14.1K | $812K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.7% | 4.6% |
Go deeper
- CBNA stock overview
- CBNA income statement
- CBNA valuation and score
- NBHC stock overview
- NBHC income statement
- NBHC valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.