Chain Bridge Bancorp vs Hawthorn Bancshares
CBNA and HWBK side by side, both in commercial banks. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CBNA and HWBK compare
Chain Bridge Bancorp is the larger company, worth 1.3 times as much as Hawthorn Bancshares ($346M against $272M).
On earnings, Hawthorn Bancshares is cheaper: it trades at 10.4× trailing earnings, against 10.6× for Chain Bridge Bancorp.
Chain Bridge Bancorp grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (41.5% versus 11.7% for Hawthorn Bancshares).
Chain Bridge Bancorp keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 43.9% compared with 30.2% at Hawthorn Bancshares.
Hawthorn Bancshares pays a dividend yielding 2.1%; Chain Bridge Bancorp does not pay one.
Hawthorn Bancshares scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 11 for Chain Bridge Bancorp), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CBNA | HWBK |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $346M | $272M |
| Share price | $52.77 | $39.40 |
| Change, 1 year | 74.2% | 25.2% |
| Change, 5 years | – | 60.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.74 | 0.42 |
| Employees | 84 | 266 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 11 | 16 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 10.6× | 10.4× (better) |
| P/S | 4.6× | 3.1× (better) |
| P/B | 1.8× | 1.4× (better) |
| P/FCF | 14.6× | 10.3× (better) |
| PEG | – | 1.97 |
| FCF yield | 6.8% | 9.7% (better) |
| Fair value | $45.98 | $39.18 |
| Margin of safety | −14.8% | −0.57% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 41.5% (better) | 11.7% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 3.3% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 76.3% (better) | 18.5% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 74.8% (better) | 19.1% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 11.0% |
| Profitability | ||
| Net margin | 43.9% (better) | 30.2% |
| FCF margin | 31.7% (better) | 30.5% |
| Return on equity | 18.5% (better) | 14.8% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Altman Z-score | 0.21 (better) | 0.21 |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 2.1% |
| Payout ratio | – | 21.5% |
| Buyback yield | – | 0.27% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 2.4% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 33.5% | 32.1% |
| Held by insiders | 32.2% | 12.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$14.1K | $50.0K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.7% | 2.9% |
Go deeper
- CBNA stock overview
- CBNA income statement
- CBNA valuation and score
- HWBK stock overview
- HWBK income statement
- HWBK valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.