CBL & Associates Properties vs Kite Realty Group Trust
CBL and KRG side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CBL and KRG compare
Kite Realty Group Trust is the larger company, worth 3.2 times as much as CBL & Associates Properties ($5.0B against $1.6B).
On earnings, CBL & Associates Properties is cheaper: it trades at 7.3× trailing earnings, against 15.5× for Kite Realty Group Trust.
CBL & Associates Properties grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (9.0% versus −7.0% for Kite Realty Group Trust).
Kite Realty Group Trust keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 42.9% compared with 37.0% at CBL & Associates Properties.
Both pay dividends: CBL & Associates Properties yields 4.3% and Kite Realty Group Trust 5.2%.
CBL & Associates Properties scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 8 for Kite Realty Group Trust), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CBL | KRG |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $1.6B | $5.0B |
| Share price | $50.41 | $25.07 |
| Change, 1 year | 71.3% | 12.7% |
| Change, 5 years | 55.1% | 13.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.79 | 0.79 |
| Employees | 500 | 228 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 11 (better) | 8 |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 3 | 3 |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 3 | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 7.3× (better) | 15.5× |
| P/S | 2.7× (better) | 6.3× |
| P/B | 3.6× | 1.8× (better) |
| Fair value | $146.53 | $21.09 |
| Margin of safety | 65.6% (better) | −18.9% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 9.0% (better) | −7.0% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 0.09% | 25.9% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 231% (better) | 144% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 227% (better) | 153% |
| Profitability | ||
| Net margin | 37.0% | 42.9% (better) |
| Return on equity | 60.6% (better) | 11.5% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 4.59 | – |
| Altman Z-score | 0.51 | 0.72 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 4.3% | 5.2% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 30.5% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 5 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 15.7% |
| Buyback yield | 1.2% (better) | 0.03% |
| Shareholder yield | 5.5% (better) | 5.2% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 79.6% | 103% |
| Held by insiders | 15.3% | 0.87% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$54.3M | −$363K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.1% | 6.2% |
Go deeper
- CBL stock overview
- CBL income statement
- CBL valuation and score
- KRG stock overview
- KRG income statement
- KRG valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.