Central Bancompany vs Enterprise Financial Services
CBC and EFSC side by side, both in commercial banks. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CBC and EFSC compare
Central Bancompany is the larger company, worth 3.8 times as much as Enterprise Financial Services ($8.6B against $2.2B).
On earnings, Enterprise Financial Services is cheaper: it trades at 12.4× trailing earnings, against 20.5× for Central Bancompany.
Central Bancompany grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (13.8% versus 5.0% for Enterprise Financial Services).
Central Bancompany keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 38.3% compared with 25.0% at Enterprise Financial Services.
Both pay dividends: Central Bancompany yields 1.0% and Enterprise Financial Services 2.2%.
Enterprise Financial Services scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 11 for Central Bancompany), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CBC | EFSC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $8.6B | $2.2B |
| Share price | $35.92 | $61.81 |
| Change, 1 year | 76.5% | 18.0% |
| Change, 5 years | 203% | 25.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.02 | 0.67 |
| Employees | 1,400 | 805 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 11 | 13 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 1 |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Dividend score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 20.5× | 12.4× (better) |
| P/S | 8.4× | 3.0× (better) |
| P/B | 2.2× | 1.2× (better) |
| P/FCF | 37.2× | 9.5× (better) |
| FCF yield | 2.7% | 10.5% (better) |
| Fair value | $20.97 | $59.79 |
| Margin of safety | −71.3% | −3.4% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 13.8% (better) | 5.0% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 17.9% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 27.8% (better) | −4.0% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 25.9% (better) | −2.9% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 14.0% |
| Profitability | ||
| Net margin | 38.3% (better) | 25.0% |
| FCF margin | 22.7% | 31.4% (better) |
| Return on equity | 11.2% (better) | 9.6% |
| Financial health | ||
| Altman Z-score | 0.62 (better) | 0.21 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.0% | 2.2% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 63.1% | 26.0% |
| Years of dividend growth | 1 | 11 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 11.1% |
| Buyback yield | −4.7% | 3.9% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | −3.7% | 6.1% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 14.5% | 84.2% |
| Held by insiders | 66.3% | 1.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $6.1M (better) | −$75.7K |
| Short interest, % of float | 11.3% | – |
Go deeper
- CBC stock overview
- CBC income statement
- CBC valuation and score
- EFSC stock overview
- EFSC income statement
- EFSC valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.