StockData

CBAK Energy Technology vs Ultralife

CBAT and ULBI side by side, both in electronic and other electrical equipment and components, except computer equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How CBAT and ULBI compare

Ultralife is the larger company, worth 2.8 times as much as CBAK Energy Technology ($262M against $93.1M).

CBAK Energy Technology grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (50.5% versus 3.0% for Ultralife).

Ultralife keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −1.5% compared with −7.4% at CBAK Energy Technology.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricCBATULBI
Size and price
Market cap$93.1M$262M
Share price$1.05$15.75
Change, 1 year13.6%152%
Change, 5 years−50.7%172%
Beta (5Y)1.170.85
Employees1,739678
StockData Score
Total score77
Valuation score3 (better)0
Growth score13 (better)
Performance score22
Health score12 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S0.4× (better)1.4×
P/B0.9× (better)2.0×
P/FCF2.5×–
FCF yield39.4% (better)−0.26%
Fair value$2.68$7.98
Margin of safety60.8% (better)−97.3%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)50.5% (better)3.0%
Revenue growth, 5Y average39.0% (better)12.2%
Net income growth (TTM)−4664%−272% (better)
Profitability
Gross margin6.4%25.7% (better)
Operating margin−11.0%−2.2% (better)
Net margin−7.4%−1.5% (better)
FCF margin16.0% (better)−0.36%
Return on equity−15.1%−2.2% (better)
Return on invested capital−16.5%−1.9% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity0.430.38 (better)
Interest coverage−22.4×–
Current ratio0.652.97 (better)
Altman Z-score−0.282.74 (better)
Piotroski F-score44
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions–32.1%
Held by insiders0.00%41.4%
Insider net buying, 12 months–$2.2M
Short interest, % of float0.71%0.66%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.