StockData

CBAK Energy Technology vs Microvast

CBAT and MVST side by side, both in electronic and other electrical equipment and components, except computer equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How CBAT and MVST compare

CBAK Energy Technology and Microvast are about the same size, with market caps of $93.1M and $102M.

CBAK Energy Technology grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (50.5% versus −34.7% for Microvast).

CBAK Energy Technology scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 5 for Microvast), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricCBATMVST
Size and price
Market cap$93.1M$102M
Share price$1.05$0.264
Change, 1 year13.6%−94.7%
Change, 5 years−50.7%−97.0%
Beta (5Y)1.171.08
Employees1,7391,908
StockData Score
Total score7 (better)5
Valuation score33
Growth score11
Performance score2 (better)0
Health score11
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S0.4×0.3× (better)
P/B0.9×0.2× (better)
P/FCF2.5×–
FCF yield39.4% (better)−65.2%
Fair value$2.68$1.38
Margin of safety60.8%80.8% (better)
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)50.5% (better)−34.7%
Revenue growth, 5Y average39.0% (better)31.8%
Net income growth (TTM)−4664%–
Profitability
Gross margin6.4%16.6% (better)
Operating margin−11.0% (better)−37.4%
Net margin−7.4%–
FCF margin16.0% (better)−22.8%
Return on equity−15.1%–
Return on invested capital−16.5% (better)−18.3%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.430.41 (better)
Interest coverage−22.4×−21.2× (better)
Current ratio0.650.99 (better)
Altman Z-score−0.28 (better)−1.76
Piotroski F-score45 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions–21.5%
Held by insiders0.00%46.8%
Insider net buying, 12 months–−$169K
Short interest, % of float0.71%9.8%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.