CBAK Energy Technology vs Dragonfly Energy
CBAT and DFLI side by side, both in electronic and other electrical equipment and components, except computer equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CBAT and DFLI compare
CBAK Energy Technology is the larger company, worth 3.1 times as much as Dragonfly Energy ($93.1M against $30.3M).
CBAK Energy Technology grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (50.5% versus −4.9% for Dragonfly Energy).
CBAK Energy Technology keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −7.4% compared with −129% at Dragonfly Energy.
CBAK Energy Technology scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 2 for Dragonfly Energy), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CBAT | DFLI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $93.1M | $30.3M |
| Share price | $1.05 | $2.02 |
| Change, 1 year | 13.6% | −97.2% |
| Change, 5 years | −50.7% | −100.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.17 | 0.92 |
| Employees | 1,739 | 141 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 0.4× (better) | 0.6× |
| P/B | 0.9× | – |
| P/FCF | 2.5× | – |
| FCF yield | 39.4% (better) | −98.2% |
| Fair value | $2.68 | – |
| Margin of safety | 60.8% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 50.5% (better) | −4.9% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 39.0% | – |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −4664% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 6.4% | 25.4% (better) |
| Operating margin | −11.0% (better) | −43.6% |
| Net margin | −7.4% (better) | −129% |
| FCF margin | 16.0% (better) | −57.3% |
| Return on equity | −15.1% | – |
| Return on invested capital | −16.5% (better) | −147% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.43 | – |
| Interest coverage | −22.4× | −1.7× (better) |
| Current ratio | 0.65 | 2.34 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | −0.28 (better) | −2.85 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | – | 10.8% |
| Held by insiders | 0.00% | 22.0% |
| Short interest, % of float | 0.71% | – |
Go deeper
- CBAT stock overview
- CBAT income statement
- CBAT valuation and score
- DFLI stock overview
- DFLI income statement
- DFLI valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.