CAVA vs Red Robin Gourmet Burgers
CAVA and RRGB side by side, both in eating and drinking places. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CAVA and RRGB compare
CAVA is the larger company, worth 40 times as much as Red Robin Gourmet Burgers ($6.9B against $172M).
CAVA grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (26.8% versus −3.7% for Red Robin Gourmet Burgers).
CAVA keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 4.8% compared with −2.5% at Red Robin Gourmet Burgers.
CAVA scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 4 for Red Robin Gourmet Burgers), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CAVA | RRGB |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $6.9B | $172M |
| Share price | $58.74 | $9.11 |
| Change, 1 year | −2.9% | 69.3% |
| Change, 5 years | – | −59.5% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.84 | 2.05 |
| Employees | 13K | 19K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 14 (better) | 4 |
| Valuation score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 107× | – |
| P/S | 5.0× | 0.1× (better) |
| P/B | 8.2× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 42.3× | 7.0× (better) |
| P/FCF | 140× | – |
| FCF yield | 0.71% (better) | −1.0% |
| Fair value | $30.26 | – |
| Margin of safety | −94.1% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 26.8% (better) | −3.7% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 6.9% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −52.9% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −53.8% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 24.6% | – |
| Operating margin | 5.2% (better) | −0.37% |
| Net margin | 4.8% (better) | −2.5% |
| FCF margin | 3.6% (better) | −0.15% |
| Return on equity | 8.3% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 11.2% (better) | −8.0% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 3.14 |
| Interest coverage | – | −0.2× |
| Current ratio | 2.48 (better) | 0.71 |
| Altman Z-score | 7.36 (better) | 1.80 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 89.4% | 51.2% |
| Held by insiders | 66.7% | 34.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$285M | −$68.0K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 40.8% | 14.4% |
Go deeper
- CAVA stock overview
- CAVA income statement
- CAVA valuation and score
- RRGB stock overview
- RRGB income statement
- RRGB valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.