StockData

CAVA vs Noodles

CAVA and NDLS side by side, both in eating and drinking places. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How CAVA and NDLS compare

CAVA is the larger company, worth 75 times as much as Noodles ($6.9B against $91.6M).

CAVA grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (26.8% versus 0.19% for Noodles).

CAVA keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 4.8% compared with −4.7% at Noodles.

CAVA scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 2 for Noodles), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricCAVANDLS
Size and price
Market cap$6.9B$91.6M
Share price$58.74$15.35
Change, 1 year−2.9%167%
Change, 5 years–−84.4%
Beta (5Y)1.841.13
Employees13K6,500
StockData Score
Total score14 (better)2
Valuation score11
Growth score3 (better)1
Performance score4 (better)0
Health score6 (better)0
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/E107×–
P/S5.0×0.2× (better)
P/B8.2×–
EV/EBITDA42.3×16.3× (better)
P/FCF140×24.4× (better)
FCF yield0.71%4.1% (better)
Fair value$30.26–
Margin of safety−94.1%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)26.8% (better)0.19%
Revenue growth, 5Y average–4.7%
Net income growth (TTM)−52.9%–
EPS growth (TTM)−53.8%–
Profitability
Gross margin24.6%–
Operating margin5.2% (better)−2.6%
Net margin4.8% (better)−4.7%
FCF margin3.6% (better)0.76%
Return on equity8.3%–
Return on invested capital11.2% (better)−16.1%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.00–
Net debt / EBITDA–8.65
Interest coverage–−1.2×
Current ratio2.48 (better)0.29
Altman Z-score7.36 (better)0.50
Piotroski F-score5 (better)3
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions89.4%47.9%
Held by insiders66.7%–
Insider net buying, 12 months−$285M–
Short interest, % of float40.8%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.