StockData

Cato vs Citi Trends

CATO and CTRN side by side, both in apparel and accessory stores. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How CATO and CTRN compare

Citi Trends is the larger company, worth 8.7 times as much as Cato ($402M against $46.0M).

Citi Trends grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (11.1% versus −1.1% for Cato).

Cato scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 8 for Citi Trends), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricCATOCTRN
Size and price
Market cap$46.0M$402M
Share price$2.31$48.16
Change, 1 year−40.2%34.9%
Change, 5 years−88.1%−42.8%
Beta (5Y)0.621.77
Employees6,7004,700
StockData Score
Total score9 (better)8
Valuation score3 (better)0
Growth score12 (better)
Performance score00
Health score56 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S0.1× (better)0.5×
P/B0.3× (better)3.2×
EV/EBITDA–13.5×
P/FCF28.3× (better)61.8×
FCF yield3.5% (better)1.6%
Fair value$9.49$22.59
Margin of safety75.7% (better)−113%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−1.1%11.1% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average2.6% (better)0.92%
EPS growth, 5Y average–−23.0%
Profitability
Gross margin33.6%39.8% (better)
Operating margin−2.1%0.63% (better)
Net margin−0.87%–
FCF margin0.25%0.75% (better)
Return on equity−3.3%–
Return on invested capital−13.7%6.6% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity0.000.00
Interest coverage–15.6×
Current ratio1.36 (better)1.13
Altman Z-score1.803.38 (better)
Piotroski F-score78 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Dividend yield0.00%–
Years of dividend growth0–
Buyback yield0.92%–
Shareholder yield0.92% (better)0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions29.4%101%
Held by insiders1.2%32.0%
Insider net buying, 12 months–−$43.2M
Superinvestors holding11
Short interest, % of float1.9%22.4%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.