StockData

Maplebear vs Grab

CART and GRAB side by side, both in miscellaneous business services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How CART and GRAB compare

Grab grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (20.5% versus 12.6% for Maplebear).

Maplebear keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 12.0% compared with 8.0% at Grab.

Maplebear scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 8 for Grab), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricCARTGRAB
Size and price
Market cap$13.1B–
Share price$56.45$2.71
Change, 1 year49.4%−55.2%
Change, 5 years476%−77.3%
Beta (5Y)0.031.32
Employees3,60012K
StockData Score
Total score13 (better)8
Valuation score00
Growth score34 (better)
Performance score4 (better)2
Health score6 (better)2
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/E31.0×–
P/S3.3×–
P/B5.6×–
EV/EBITDA17.4×–
P/FCF11.1×–
PEG1.67–
FCF yield9.0%–
Fair value$45.31–
Margin of safety−24.6%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)12.6%20.5% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average–48.4%
Net income growth (TTM)−1.6%–
EPS growth (TTM)7.7%–
Profitability
Gross margin72.6% (better)43.2%
Operating margin14.7% (better)1.9%
Net margin12.0% (better)8.0%
FCF margin29.5% (better)−0.53%
Return on equity17.1% (better)4.1%
Return on invested capital29.3% (better)0.94%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.000.30 (better)
Net debt / EBITDA–−3.41
Interest coverage–0.9×
Current ratio2.28 (better)1.52
Altman Z-score8.05–
Piotroski F-score7 (better)5
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield14.2%–
Shareholder yield14.2%–
Ownership
Held by institutions83.6%–
Held by insiders71.9%25.5%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$27.6M$19.5M (better)
Superinvestors holding2–
Short interest, % of float33.7%–

Go deeper

Other comparisons

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.