CarGurus vs NerdWallet
CARG and NRDS side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CARG and NRDS compare
CarGurus is the larger company, worth 6.3 times as much as NerdWallet ($3.1B against $492M).
On earnings, NerdWallet is cheaper: it trades at 9.9× trailing earnings, against 17.6× for CarGurus.
CarGurus grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (13.5% versus 11.3% for NerdWallet).
CarGurus keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 18.5% compared with 6.1% at NerdWallet.
CarGurus scores higher on the StockData Score (20 against 16 for NerdWallet), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CARG | NRDS |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $3.1B | $492M |
| Share price | $34.81 | $7.70 |
| Change, 1 year | −1.7% | −46.3% |
| Change, 5 years | −8.2% | −71.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.15 | 1.28 |
| Employees | 1,218 | – |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 20 (better) | 16 |
| Valuation score | 5 | 5 |
| Growth score | 3 | 3 |
| Performance score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 3 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 17.6× | 9.9× (better) |
| P/S | 3.1× | 0.6× (better) |
| P/B | 10.2× | 1.4× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 11.2× | 3.8× (better) |
| P/FCF | 9.5× | 3.4× (better) |
| PEG | 0.49 | – |
| FCF yield | 10.5% | 29.7% (better) |
| Fair value | $46.99 | $23.04 |
| Margin of safety | 25.9% | 66.6% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 13.5% (better) | 11.3% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 10.5% | 27.8% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 21.1% (better) | −26.9% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 34.7% (better) | −14.3% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 17.9% | 48.0% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 92.1% | 93.8% (better) |
| Operating margin | 24.2% (better) | 8.3% |
| Net margin | 18.5% (better) | 6.1% |
| FCF margin | 32.7% (better) | 16.5% |
| Return on equity | 54.2% (better) | 14.4% |
| Return on invested capital | 111% (better) | 19.0% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Interest coverage | – | 122× |
| Current ratio | 2.29 | 2.74 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 10.51 (better) | 5.17 |
| Piotroski F-score | 8 | 9 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 9.1% | 30.5% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 9.1% | 30.5% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 89.7% | 42.6% |
| Held by insiders | 19.6% | 45.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$6.5M (better) | −$36.9M |
| Short interest, % of float | 13.1% | 12.9% |
Go deeper
- CARG stock overview
- CARG income statement
- CARG valuation and score
- NRDS stock overview
- NRDS income statement
- NRDS valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.