StockData

Capstone vs SMJ International

CAPS and SMJF side by side, both in wholesale trade-durable goods. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How CAPS and SMJF compare

Capstone grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (48.8% versus 3.6% for SMJ International).

SMJ International keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −5.3% compared with −31.1% at Capstone.

Capstone scores higher on the StockData Score (6 against 2 for SMJ International), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricCAPSSMJF
Size and price
Market cap$1.8M–
Share price$2.02$1.40
Change, 1 year−93.9%–
Change, 5 years−99.6%–
Beta (5Y)0.44–
Employees9337
StockData Score
Total score6 (better)2
Valuation score3 (better)0
Growth score2 (better)0
Performance score00
Health score12 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S0.0×–
P/B0.1×–
FCF yield−185%–
Fair value$44.12–
Margin of safety95.4%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)48.8% (better)3.6%
Net income growth (TTM)–−191%
EPS growth (TTM)–−200%
Profitability
Gross margin26.7%34.6% (better)
Operating margin−13.8%−5.5% (better)
Net margin−31.1%−5.3% (better)
FCF margin−5.1% (better)−19.9%
Return on equity−107%−7.0% (better)
Return on invested capital−23.8%−5.4% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity0.930.09 (better)
Interest coverage−1.4×–
Current ratio1.044.64 (better)
Altman Z-score−4.78–
Piotroski F-score33
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield0.00%–
Shareholder yield0.00%–
Ownership
Held by institutions0.76%–
Held by insiders–58.7%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.