CrossAmerica Partners LP vs Global Partners LP
CAPL and GLP side by side, both in wholesale trade-non-durable goods. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CAPL and GLP compare
Global Partners LP is the larger company, worth 1.9 times as much as CrossAmerica Partners LP ($1.5B against $774M).
Global Partners LP grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (29.5% versus 9.1% for CrossAmerica Partners LP).
Both pay dividends: CrossAmerica Partners LP yields 7.8% and Global Partners LP 5.2%.
Global Partners LP scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 9 for CrossAmerica Partners LP), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CAPL | GLP |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $774M | $1.5B |
| Share price | $20.27 | $44.27 |
| Change, 1 year | −2.5% | 8.8% |
| Change, 5 years | 6.3% | 88.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.31 | 0.74 |
| Employees | 548 | 4,700 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 | 16 (better) |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Growth score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Health score | 1 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 0.2× | 0.1× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 8.3× | 4.2× (better) |
| P/FCF | 8.6× | 4.5× (better) |
| FCF yield | 11.6% | 22.5% (better) |
| Fair value | $29.29 | $105.37 |
| Margin of safety | 30.8% | 58.0% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 9.1% | 29.5% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 13.6% | 17.4% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 126% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 10.3% (better) | 5.2% |
| Operating margin | 2.7% (better) | 1.5% |
| Net margin | – | 0.93% |
| FCF margin | 2.2% (better) | 1.4% |
| Financial health | ||
| Net debt / EBITDA | 3.98 | – |
| Interest coverage | 2.4× | – |
| Current ratio | 0.78 | 1.09 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 4.94 | 6.19 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 7.8% (better) | 5.2% |
| Shareholder yield | 7.8% (better) | 5.2% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 23.6% | 49.9% |
| Held by insiders | 70.7% | 12.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $0 | $7.3M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 0.70% | 0.74% |
Go deeper
- CAPL stock overview
- CAPL income statement
- CAPL valuation and score
- GLP stock overview
- GLP income statement
- GLP valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.