Callaway Golf vs Peloton Interactive
CALY and PTON side by side, both in dolls, toys, games and sporting and athletic. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CALY and PTON compare
Callaway Golf is the larger company, worth 1.2 times as much as Peloton Interactive ($3.1B against $2.5B).
Callaway Golf grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (1.9% versus −0.05% for Peloton Interactive).
Peloton Interactive keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 5.9% compared with −9.6% at Callaway Golf.
Callaway Golf scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 7 for Peloton Interactive), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CALY | PTON |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $3.1B | $2.5B |
| Share price | $17.10 | $5.70 |
| Change, 1 year | 61.3% | −23.6% |
| Change, 5 years | −41.6% | −87.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.09 | 2.21 |
| Employees | 28K | 1,736 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 11 (better) | 7 |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 19.0× |
| P/S | 1.5× | 1.0× (better) |
| P/B | 1.4× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 9.3× | 4.1× (better) |
| P/FCF | 10.2× | 5.5× (better) |
| FCF yield | 9.8% | 18.1% (better) |
| Fair value | $18.65 | $6.38 |
| Margin of safety | 8.3% | 10.7% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 1.9% (better) | −0.05% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.3% (better) | −9.5% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 47.4% | 54.8% (better) |
| Operating margin | 11.6% (better) | 9.6% |
| Net margin | −9.6% | 5.9% (better) |
| FCF margin | 14.2% | 18.5% (better) |
| Return on equity | −8.7% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 6.8% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.02 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −1.33 | −4.63 |
| Interest coverage | 9.6× (better) | 1.9× |
| Current ratio | 3.09 (better) | 3.05 |
| Altman Z-score | 4.04 (better) | −0.71 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 8 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 4.4% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 4.4% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 86.8% | 92.3% |
| Held by insiders | 13.7% | 2.3% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$152M | −$8.5M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.6% | 13.9% |
Go deeper
- CALY stock overview
- CALY income statement
- CALY valuation and score
- PTON stock overview
- PTON income statement
- PTON valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.