Callaway Golf vs Johnson Outdoors
CALY and JOUT side by side, both in dolls, toys, games and sporting and athletic. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CALY and JOUT compare
Callaway Golf is the larger company, worth 6.1 times as much as Johnson Outdoors ($3.1B against $501M).
Johnson Outdoors grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (17.5% versus 1.9% for Callaway Golf).
Johnson Outdoors keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −1.2% compared with −9.6% at Callaway Golf.
Johnson Outdoors pays a dividend yielding 2.8%; Callaway Golf does not pay one.
Johnson Outdoors scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 11 for Callaway Golf), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CALY | JOUT |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $3.1B | $501M |
| Share price | $17.10 | $47.80 |
| Change, 1 year | 61.3% | 22.2% |
| Change, 5 years | −41.6% | −56.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.09 | 0.68 |
| Employees | 28K | 1,300 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 11 | 12 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 1.5× | 0.8× (better) |
| P/B | 1.4× | 1.2× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 9.3× | 8.6× (better) |
| P/FCF | 10.2× (better) | 16.8× |
| FCF yield | 9.8% (better) | 6.0% |
| Fair value | $18.65 | $45.77 |
| Margin of safety | 8.3% (better) | −4.4% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 1.9% | 17.5% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.3% (better) | −0.06% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 47.4% (better) | 39.7% |
| Operating margin | 11.6% (better) | 2.7% |
| Net margin | −9.6% | −1.2% (better) |
| FCF margin | 14.2% (better) | 4.5% |
| Return on equity | −8.7% | −1.8% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 6.8% (better) | 3.2% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.02 (better) | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −1.33 | – |
| Interest coverage | 9.6× | 81.8× (better) |
| Current ratio | 3.09 | 3.37 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 4.04 (better) | 3.79 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 2.8% |
| Buyback yield | 4.4% (better) | 0.02% |
| Shareholder yield | 4.4% (better) | 2.8% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 86.8% | 63.6% |
| Held by insiders | 13.7% | 16.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$152M | −$1.1M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.6% | 4.8% |
Go deeper
- CALY stock overview
- CALY income statement
- CALY valuation and score
- JOUT stock overview
- JOUT income statement
- JOUT valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.