Callaway Golf vs Hasbro
CALY and HAS side by side, both in miscellaneous manufacturing industries. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CALY and HAS compare
Hasbro is the larger company, worth 6.2 times as much as Callaway Golf ($16.8B against $2.7B).
Hasbro grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (27.6% versus 3.7% for Callaway Golf).
Hasbro keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 15.6% compared with −12.4% at Callaway Golf.
Hasbro pays a dividend yielding 2.4%; Callaway Golf does not pay one.
Hasbro scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 10 for Callaway Golf), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CALY | HAS |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $2.7B | $16.8B |
| Share price | $15.16 | $119.09 |
| Change, 1 year | 59.4% | 52.8% |
| Change, 5 years | −48.4% | 24.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.13 | 0.84 |
| Employees | 28K | 4,520 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 | 16 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 17.7× |
| P/S | 1.3× (better) | 2.7× |
| P/B | 1.3× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 18.6× | 13.3× (better) |
| P/FCF | 8.0× (better) | 13.7× |
| FCF yield | 12.5% (better) | 7.3% |
| Fair value | $12.88 | $133.86 |
| Margin of safety | −17.7% | 11.0% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 3.7% | 27.6% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.3% (better) | −0.37% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 78.0% |
| Operating margin | 9.6% | 21.9% (better) |
| Net margin | −12.4% | 15.6% (better) |
| FCF margin | 15.9% | 20.1% (better) |
| Return on equity | −11.3% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 5.3% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.02 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −1.70 | 1.82 (better) |
| Interest coverage | – | 7.8× |
| Current ratio | 3.04 (better) | 1.40 |
| Altman Z-score | 3.61 | 4.10 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 2.4% |
| Payout ratio | – | 41.3% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 1 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 0.58% |
| Buyback yield | 3.1% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 3.1% (better) | 2.4% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 86.8% | 98.3% |
| Held by insiders | 13.7% | 0.64% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$152M | −$50.2M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.0% | 5.9% |
Go deeper
- CALY stock overview
- CALY income statement
- CALY valuation and score
- HAS stock overview
- HAS income statement
- HAS valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.