Callaway Golf vs Acushnet
CALY and GOLF side by side, both in dolls, toys, games and sporting and athletic. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CALY and GOLF compare
Acushnet is the larger company, worth 1.6 times as much as Callaway Golf ($4.8B against $3.1B).
Acushnet grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (6.8% versus 1.9% for Callaway Golf).
Acushnet keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 8.2% compared with −9.6% at Callaway Golf.
Acushnet pays a dividend yielding 1.2%; Callaway Golf does not pay one.
Acushnet scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 11 for Callaway Golf), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CALY | GOLF |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $3.1B | $4.8B |
| Share price | $17.10 | $82.94 |
| Change, 1 year | 61.3% | 1.8% |
| Change, 5 years | −41.6% | 46.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.09 | 0.83 |
| Employees | 28K | 7,300 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 11 | 16 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 3 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 22.5× |
| P/S | 1.5× (better) | 1.8× |
| P/B | 1.4× (better) | 5.6× |
| EV/EBITDA | 9.3× (better) | 13.5× |
| P/FCF | 10.2× (better) | 20.3× |
| PEG | – | 5.37 |
| FCF yield | 9.8% (better) | 4.9% |
| Fair value | $18.65 | $65.19 |
| Margin of safety | 8.3% (better) | −27.2% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 1.9% | 6.8% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.3% | 9.7% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −0.81% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 0.82% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 19.4% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 47.4% | 49.4% (better) |
| Operating margin | 11.6% | 13.3% (better) |
| Net margin | −9.6% | 8.2% (better) |
| FCF margin | 14.2% (better) | 8.8% |
| Return on equity | −8.7% | 25.7% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 6.8% | 16.9% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.02 (better) | 1.01 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −1.33 | 1.85 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 9.6× | – |
| Current ratio | 3.09 (better) | 2.02 |
| Altman Z-score | 4.04 (better) | 3.69 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 1.2% |
| Payout ratio | – | 26.8% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 9 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 8.7% |
| Buyback yield | 4.4% (better) | 2.2% |
| Shareholder yield | 4.4% (better) | 3.4% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 86.8% | 55.1% |
| Held by insiders | 13.7% | 52.9% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$152M | −$3.4M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.6% | 8.6% |
Go deeper
- CALY stock overview
- CALY income statement
- CALY valuation and score
- GOLF stock overview
- GOLF income statement
- GOLF valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.