Caleres vs Steven Madden
CAL and SHOO side by side, both in consumer discretionary. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CAL and SHOO compare
Steven Madden is the larger company, worth 6.8 times as much as Caleres ($3.2B against $465M).
Steven Madden grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (18.2% versus 7.3% for Caleres).
Both pay dividends: Caleres yields 2.1% and Steven Madden 1.9%.
Caleres scores higher on the StockData Score (18 against 10 for Steven Madden), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CAL | SHOO |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $465M | $3.2B |
| Share price | $13.49 | $43.50 |
| Change, 1 year | 14.3% | 26.4% |
| Change, 5 years | −49.3% | −12.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.19 | 1.16 |
| Employees | 10K | 6,300 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 18 (better) | 10 |
| Valuation score | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 9.1× | – |
| P/S | 0.2× (better) | 1.2× |
| P/B | 0.7× (better) | 3.4× |
| EV/EBITDA | 4.9× (better) | 13.7× |
| P/FCF | 6.9× (better) | 14.2× |
| FCF yield | 14.5% (better) | 7.0% |
| Fair value | $23.13 | $31.98 |
| Margin of safety | 41.7% (better) | −36.0% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 7.3% | 18.2% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.4% | 16.1% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −12.4% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −14.9% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 46.2% (better) | 46.1% |
| Operating margin | 3.1% | 7.5% (better) |
| Net margin | 1.8% | – |
| FCF margin | 2.4% | 8.2% (better) |
| Return on equity | 8.2% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 11.7% | 15.1% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.13 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 0.51 |
| Current ratio | 1.11 | 1.91 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.04 | 5.76 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | – |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.1% (better) | 1.9% |
| Payout ratio | 18.0% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 0.00% | 41.1% (better) |
| Buyback yield | 1.2% (better) | 0.43% |
| Shareholder yield | 3.3% (better) | 2.4% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 86.5% | 100% |
| Held by insiders | 5.1% | 2.3% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$168K (better) | −$4.0M |
| Short interest, % of float | 12.3% | 6.3% |
Go deeper
- CAL stock overview
- CAL income statement
- CAL valuation and score
- SHOO stock overview
- SHOO income statement
- SHOO valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.