Caleres vs Genesco
CAL and GCO side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CAL and GCO compare
Caleres and Genesco are about the same size, with market caps of $465M and $407M.
Caleres grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (7.3% versus 3.0% for Genesco).
Caleres keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 1.8% compared with 1.7% at Genesco.
Caleres pays a dividend yielding 2.1%; Genesco does not pay one.
Caleres scores higher on the StockData Score (18 against 10 for Genesco), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CAL | GCO |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $465M | $407M |
| Share price | $13.49 | $37.65 |
| Change, 1 year | 14.3% | 26.9% |
| Change, 5 years | −49.3% | −46.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.19 | 1.57 |
| Employees | 10K | 16K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 18 (better) | 10 |
| Valuation score | 5 (better) | 3 |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 9.1× | – |
| P/S | 0.2× (better) | 0.2× |
| P/B | 0.7× (better) | 0.7× |
| EV/EBITDA | 4.9× | 3.6× (better) |
| P/FCF | 6.9× | 5.5× (better) |
| FCF yield | 14.5% | 18.1% (better) |
| Fair value | $23.13 | $55.03 |
| Margin of safety | 41.7% (better) | 31.6% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 7.3% (better) | 3.0% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.4% | 6.4% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −12.4% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −14.9% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 46.2% | 47.5% (better) |
| Operating margin | 3.1% (better) | 2.0% |
| Net margin | 1.8% (better) | 1.7% |
| FCF margin | 2.4% | 3.0% (better) |
| Return on equity | 8.2% (better) | 7.8% |
| Return on invested capital | 11.7% (better) | 8.3% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.03 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | −0.41 |
| Current ratio | 1.11 | 1.58 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.04 | 2.41 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.1% | – |
| Payout ratio | 18.0% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 0.00% | – |
| Buyback yield | 1.2% (better) | 0.00% |
| Shareholder yield | 3.3% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 86.5% | 88.7% |
| Held by insiders | 5.1% | 30.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$168K | $110K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 12.3% | 16.8% |
Go deeper
- CAL stock overview
- CAL income statement
- CAL valuation and score
- GCO stock overview
- GCO income statement
- GCO valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.