Cheesecake Factory vs Brinker International
CAKE and EAT side by side, both in eating and drinking places. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CAKE and EAT compare
Brinker International is the larger company, worth 1.6 times as much as Cheesecake Factory ($8.9B against $5.6B).
On earnings, Brinker International is cheaper: it trades at 19.5× trailing earnings, against 30.5× for Cheesecake Factory.
Brinker International grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (7.9% versus 5.7% for Cheesecake Factory).
Brinker International keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 8.4% compared with 4.6% at Cheesecake Factory.
Cheesecake Factory pays a dividend yielding 1.0%; Brinker International does not pay one.
Brinker International scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 11 for Cheesecake Factory), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CAKE | EAT |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $5.6B | $8.9B |
| Share price | $112.64 | $212.18 |
| Change, 1 year | 124% | 84.5% |
| Change, 5 years | 142% | 375% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.18 | 1.21 |
| Employees | 48K | 85K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 11 | 13 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 5 | 5 |
| Health score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 30.5× | 19.5× (better) |
| P/S | 1.4× (better) | 1.5× |
| P/B | 10.8× (better) | 20.0× |
| EV/EBITDA | 18.8× | 14.8× (better) |
| P/FCF | 27.2× | 15.9× (better) |
| PEG | 0.58 | 0.29 (better) |
| FCF yield | 3.7% | 6.3% (better) |
| Fair value | $74.70 | $207.26 |
| Margin of safety | −50.8% | −2.4% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 5.7% | 7.9% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 13.6% (better) | 11.7% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 12.4% | 27.1% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 13.5% | 30.6% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 30.9% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 74.4% |
| Operating margin | 5.3% | 10.7% (better) |
| Net margin | 4.6% | 8.4% (better) |
| FCF margin | 5.3% | 9.6% (better) |
| Return on equity | 38.8% | 120% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 21.0% | 62.2% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.08 | 1.00 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.16 | 0.54 (better) |
| Interest coverage | – | 15.3× |
| Current ratio | 0.59 (better) | 0.45 |
| Altman Z-score | 3.12 | 5.21 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 8 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.0% | – |
| Payout ratio | 31.0% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 24.6% | – |
| Buyback yield | 0.75% | 5.0% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 1.8% | 5.0% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 103% | 113% |
| Held by insiders | 7.5% | 1.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$30.1M (better) | −$59.2M |
| Short interest, % of float | 22.3% | 12.6% |
Go deeper
- CAKE stock overview
- CAKE income statement
- CAKE valuation and score
- EAT stock overview
- EAT income statement
- EAT valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.