Camden National vs Dime Commercial Bancshares
CAC and DCOM side by side, both in commercial banks. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CAC and DCOM compare
Dime Commercial Bancshares is the larger company, worth 1.9 times as much as Camden National ($1.8B against $969M).
On earnings, Camden National is cheaper: it trades at 11.0× trailing earnings, against 13.6× for Dime Commercial Bancshares.
Dime Commercial Bancshares grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (32.9% versus 11.7% for Camden National).
Dime Commercial Bancshares keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 583% compared with 207% at Camden National.
Both pay dividends: Camden National yields 2.9% and Dime Commercial Bancshares 2.4%.
Camden National scores higher on the StockData Score (17 against 14 for Dime Commercial Bancshares), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CAC | DCOM |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $969M | $1.8B |
| Share price | $57.34 | $41.76 |
| Change, 1 year | 47.7% | 59.6% |
| Change, 5 years | 14.3% | 10.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.56 | 0.85 |
| Employees | 683 | 902 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 17 (better) | 14 |
| Valuation score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 3 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 11.0× (better) | 13.6× |
| P/S | 22.6× (better) | 75.2× |
| P/B | 1.3× | 1.2× (better) |
| P/FCF | 9.5× | – |
| FCF yield | 10.6% | – |
| Fair value | $56.12 | $39.31 |
| Margin of safety | −2.2% (better) | −6.2% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 11.7% | 32.9% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 8.5% | 29.0% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 80.4% | 144% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 65.2% | 173% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −0.56% | 6.3% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Net margin | 207% | 583% (better) |
| FCF margin | 240% | – |
| Return on equity | 12.9% (better) | 9.6% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.70 | – |
| Altman Z-score | 0.22 (better) | 0.16 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.9% (better) | 2.4% |
| Payout ratio | 32.2% | 30.2% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 4.9% | – |
| Buyback yield | 0.41% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 3.3% (better) | 2.4% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 75.6% | 90.4% |
| Held by insiders | 2.6% | 12.3% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$10.8M |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.5% | – |
Go deeper
- CAC stock overview
- CAC income statement
- CAC valuation and score
- DCOM stock overview
- DCOM income statement
- DCOM valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.