Byrna Technologies vs Tandy Leather Factory
BYRN and TLF side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BYRN and TLF compare
Byrna Technologies is the larger company, worth 5.4 times as much as Tandy Leather Factory ($97.6M against $18.0M).
Tandy Leather Factory grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (3.4% versus −13.4% for Byrna Technologies).
Tandy Leather Factory keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −2.1% compared with −9.2% at Byrna Technologies.
Tandy Leather Factory pays a dividend yielding 34.1%; Byrna Technologies does not pay one.
Tandy Leather Factory scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 12 for Byrna Technologies), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BYRN | TLF |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $97.6M | $18.0M |
| Share price | $4.30 | $2.20 |
| Change, 1 year | −79.0% | −25.7% |
| Change, 5 years | −71.6% | −58.5% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.19 | 0.34 |
| Employees | 159 | 538 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 12 | 13 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 | 3 |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 1.0× | 0.2× (better) |
| P/B | 1.8× | 0.4× (better) |
| P/FCF | 28.4× | – |
| FCF yield | 3.5% (better) | −12.8% |
| Fair value | $9.51 | $7.13 |
| Margin of safety | 54.8% | 69.1% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −13.4% | 3.4% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 48.1% (better) | 3.6% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −155% | −115% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −160% | −116% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 54.6% | 59.5% (better) |
| Operating margin | −11.4% | −0.49% (better) |
| Net margin | −9.2% | −2.1% (better) |
| FCF margin | 3.6% (better) | −3.0% |
| Return on equity | −14.9% | −3.2% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −17.2% | −0.75% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Current ratio | 5.54 (better) | 4.55 |
| Altman Z-score | 6.53 (better) | 2.70 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 34.1% |
| Buyback yield | 2.0% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 2.0% | 34.1% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 49.7% | 58.9% |
| Held by insiders | 31.9% | 1.8% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $448K | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 6.8% | 0.06% |
Go deeper
- BYRN stock overview
- BYRN income statement
- BYRN valuation and score
- TLF stock overview
- TLF income statement
- TLF valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.