Beyond Meat vs Vital Farms
BYND and VITL side by side, both in food and kindred products. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BYND and VITL compare
Vital Farms is the larger company, worth 4.0 times as much as Beyond Meat ($389M against $98.5M).
Vital Farms grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (16.4% versus −12.9% for Beyond Meat).
Beyond Meat keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 124% compared with 0.02% at Vital Farms.
Vital Farms scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 5 for Beyond Meat), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BYND | VITL |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $98.5M | $389M |
| Share price | $5.38 | $9.07 |
| Change, 1 year | −83.9% | −72.1% |
| Change, 5 years | −99.8% | −52.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 2.00 | 0.73 |
| Employees | 589 | 739 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 5 | 11 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 1 |
| Growth score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 0.4× (better) | 0.5× |
| P/B | – | 1.4× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 37.4× |
| FCF yield | −90.9% | −32.4% (better) |
| Fair value | – | $8.41 |
| Margin of safety | – | −7.9% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −12.9% | 16.4% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −7.5% | 28.8% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −99.7% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −104% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 39.8% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 8.6% | 28.1% (better) |
| Operating margin | −118% | 0.04% (better) |
| Net margin | 124% (better) | 0.02% |
| FCF margin | −35.4% | −16.5% (better) |
| Return on equity | – | 0.05% |
| Return on invested capital | −125% | 0.07% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | −11.1× | 0.3× (better) |
| Current ratio | 3.12 (better) | 1.10 |
| Altman Z-score | −4.64 | 2.96 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 | 3 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 21.9% | 85.3% |
| Held by insiders | – | 39.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$282K (better) | −$3.5M |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 36.9% |
Go deeper
- BYND stock overview
- BYND income statement
- BYND valuation and score
- VITL stock overview
- VITL income statement
- VITL valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.