Boyd Gaming vs Red Rock Resorts
BYD and RRR side by side, both in hotels and motels. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BYD and RRR compare
Boyd Gaming and Red Rock Resorts are about the same size, with market caps of $5.5B and $5.1B.
On earnings, Boyd Gaming is cheaper: it trades at 11.7× trailing earnings, against 29.3× for Red Rock Resorts.
Red Rock Resorts grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (1.1% versus 0.33% for Boyd Gaming).
Boyd Gaming keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 12.3% compared with 5.8% at Red Rock Resorts.
Both pay dividends: Boyd Gaming yields 1.0% and Red Rock Resorts 2.1%.
Boyd Gaming scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 5 for Red Rock Resorts), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BYD | RRR |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $5.5B | $5.1B |
| Share price | $77.24 | $48.86 |
| Change, 1 year | −4.5% | −16.1% |
| Change, 5 years | 29.3% | −3.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.91 | 1.12 |
| Employees | 16K | 9,500 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 15 (better) | 5 |
| Valuation score | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 11.7× (better) | 29.3× |
| P/S | 1.3× (better) | 2.5× |
| P/B | 2.2× (better) | 31.2× |
| EV/EBITDA | 7.2× (better) | 13.0× |
| P/FCF | – | 101× |
| PEG | 0.21 | – |
| FCF yield | −0.29% | 0.99% (better) |
| Fair value | $108.36 | $34.77 |
| Margin of safety | 28.7% (better) | −40.5% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 0.33% | 1.1% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 13.4% (better) | 11.2% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −73.2% | −38.6% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −71.1% | −41.0% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 17.8% | 22.3% (better) |
| Net margin | 12.3% (better) | 5.8% |
| FCF margin | −0.38% | 2.5% (better) |
| Return on equity | 19.6% | 60.8% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 13.0% (better) | 10.7% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.09 (better) | 22.61 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.17 (better) | 5.29 |
| Interest coverage | 6.1× (better) | 2.3× |
| Current ratio | 0.33 | 0.84 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.09 (better) | 1.56 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.0% | 2.1% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 11.5% | 104% |
| Years of dividend growth | 3 | – |
| Buyback yield | 12.1% (better) | 2.2% |
| Shareholder yield | 13.1% (better) | 4.3% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 77.1% | 50.9% |
| Held by insiders | 12.8% | 44.8% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$24.8M | −$3.0M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 7.2% | 6.9% |
Go deeper
- BYD stock overview
- BYD income statement
- BYD valuation and score
- RRR stock overview
- RRR income statement
- RRR valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.