Boyd Gaming vs PENN Entertainment
BYD and PENN side by side, both in hotels and motels. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BYD and PENN compare
Boyd Gaming is the larger company, worth 2.5 times as much as PENN Entertainment ($5.3B against $2.1B).
PENN Entertainment grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (6.1% versus 1.7% for Boyd Gaming).
Boyd Gaming keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 44.3% compared with −12.7% at PENN Entertainment.
Boyd Gaming pays a dividend yielding 1.1%; PENN Entertainment does not pay one.
Boyd Gaming scores higher on the StockData Score (17 against 5 for PENN Entertainment), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BYD | PENN |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $5.3B | $2.1B |
| Share price | $72.83 | $15.89 |
| Change, 1 year | −5.2% | −4.3% |
| Change, 5 years | 8.0% | −74.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.94 | 1.48 |
| Employees | 16K | 23K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 17 (better) | 5 |
| Valuation score | 5 (better) | 3 |
| Growth score | 1 | 1 |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 3.2× | – |
| P/S | 1.3× | 0.3× (better) |
| P/B | 2.1× | 1.1× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 7.4× | – |
| P/FCF | 151× | – |
| PEG | 0.06 | – |
| FCF yield | 0.66% | – |
| Fair value | $89.58 | $35.52 |
| Margin of safety | 18.7% | 55.3% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 1.7% | 6.1% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 13.4% | 14.2% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 222% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 250% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 16.4% (better) | −7.9% |
| Net margin | 44.3% (better) | −12.7% |
| FCF margin | 0.86% | – |
| Return on equity | 93.3% (better) | −37.4% |
| Return on invested capital | 11.2% (better) | −10.1% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.05 (better) | 1.49 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.24 | – |
| Interest coverage | 5.7× (better) | −1.3× |
| Current ratio | 0.77 | 0.89 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.20 (better) | 0.32 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.1% | – |
| Payout ratio | 3.2% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 3 | – |
| Buyback yield | 12.4% (better) | 11.2% |
| Shareholder yield | 13.5% (better) | 11.2% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 74.9% | 106% |
| Held by insiders | 12.4% | 7.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$26.4M | $888K (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 7.5% | 13.6% |
Go deeper
- BYD stock overview
- BYD income statement
- BYD valuation and score
- PENN stock overview
- PENN income statement
- PENN valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.