Boyd Gaming vs Full House Resorts
BYD and FLL side by side, both in hotels and motels. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BYD and FLL compare
Boyd Gaming is the larger company, worth 278 times as much as Full House Resorts ($5.5B against $19.6M).
Full House Resorts grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (3.3% versus 0.33% for Boyd Gaming).
Boyd Gaming keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 12.3% compared with −12.2% at Full House Resorts.
Boyd Gaming pays a dividend yielding 1.0%; Full House Resorts does not pay one.
Boyd Gaming scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 4 for Full House Resorts), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BYD | FLL |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $5.5B | $19.6M |
| Share price | $77.24 | $0.536 |
| Change, 1 year | −4.5% | −79.3% |
| Change, 5 years | 29.3% | −94.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.91 | 1.58 |
| Employees | 16K | 1,831 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 15 (better) | 4 |
| Valuation score | 5 (better) | 2 |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 11.7× | – |
| P/S | 1.3× | 0.1× (better) |
| P/B | 2.2× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 7.2× (better) | 9.3× |
| P/FCF | – | 2.6× |
| PEG | 0.21 | – |
| FCF yield | −0.29% | 38.5% (better) |
| Fair value | $108.36 | – |
| Margin of safety | 28.7% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 0.33% | 3.3% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 13.4% | 19.2% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −73.2% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −71.1% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 93.1% |
| Operating margin | 17.8% (better) | 2.6% |
| Net margin | 12.3% (better) | −12.2% |
| FCF margin | −0.38% | 2.4% (better) |
| Return on equity | 19.6% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 13.0% (better) | 1.5% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.09 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.17 (better) | 8.91 |
| Interest coverage | 6.1× (better) | 0.2× |
| Current ratio | 0.33 | 0.80 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.09 (better) | 0.22 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.0% | – |
| Payout ratio | 11.5% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 3 | – |
| Buyback yield | 12.1% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 13.1% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 77.1% | 38.1% |
| Held by insiders | 12.8% | 8.8% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$24.8M | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 7.2% | 1.9% |
Go deeper
- BYD stock overview
- BYD income statement
- BYD valuation and score
- FLL stock overview
- FLL income statement
- FLL valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.