Park Ha Biological Technology vs Zone Frontier
BYAH and ZONE side by side, both in soap, detergents, and cleaning preparations; perfumes, cosmetics, and other toilet preparations. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BYAH and ZONE compare
Zone Frontier grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (64.3% versus 6.0% for Park Ha Biological Technology).
Park Ha Biological Technology keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −965% compared with −5113% at Zone Frontier.
Zone Frontier scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 6 for Park Ha Biological Technology), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BYAH | ZONE |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $1.7B |
| Share price | $1.48 | $3.31 |
| Change, 1 year | −98.8% | −89.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.97 | – |
| Employees | 25 | 18 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 | 7 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | – | 495× |
| P/B | – | 32.8× |
| FCF yield | – | −1.1% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 6.0% | 64.3% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −5191% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −4410% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 94.4% (better) | 37.8% |
| Operating margin | −956% (better) | −1702% |
| Net margin | −965% (better) | −5113% |
| FCF margin | −0.12% (better) | −534% |
| Return on equity | −506% (better) | −657% |
| Return on invested capital | −1451% | −229% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | −588998.0× | – |
| Current ratio | 3.36 | 21.24 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | – | 1009.77 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | – | −1.6% |
| Shareholder yield | – | −1.6% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | – | 10.0% |
| Held by insiders | – | 3.7% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | $292K |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 0.08% |
Go deeper
- BYAH stock overview
- BYAH income statement
- BYAH valuation and score
- ZONE stock overview
- ZONE income statement
- ZONE valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.