BlueLinx vs SiteOne Landscape Supply
BXC and SITE side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BXC and SITE compare
SiteOne Landscape Supply is the larger company, worth 7.8 times as much as BlueLinx ($4.8B against $621M).
SiteOne Landscape Supply grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (3.3% versus 2.1% for BlueLinx).
SiteOne Landscape Supply keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 3.4% compared with −0.06% at BlueLinx.
SiteOne Landscape Supply scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 7 for BlueLinx), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BXC | SITE |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $621M | $4.8B |
| Share price | $79.03 | $110.87 |
| Change, 1 year | 16.4% | −16.1% |
| Change, 5 years | 13.9% | −54.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.46 | 1.41 |
| Employees | 2,160 | 8,200 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 | 13 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Growth score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Health score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 30.4× |
| P/S | 0.2× (better) | 1.0× |
| P/B | 1.0× (better) | 2.9× |
| EV/EBITDA | 7.6× (better) | 20.9× |
| P/FCF | 10.7× (better) | 18.7× |
| FCF yield | 9.3% (better) | 5.4% |
| Fair value | $104.52 | $97.93 |
| Margin of safety | 24.4% (better) | −13.2% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 2.1% | 3.3% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −0.94% | 11.7% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −107% | 30.9% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −107% | 33.2% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −70.2% | 4.2% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 15.8% | 35.1% (better) |
| Operating margin | 1.2% | 5.3% (better) |
| Net margin | −0.06% | 3.4% (better) |
| FCF margin | 1.9% | 5.4% (better) |
| Return on equity | −0.31% | 9.8% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 4.8% | 9.5% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.48 | 0.30 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −0.27 | 1.66 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 0.7× | 7.1× (better) |
| Current ratio | 4.01 (better) | 2.30 |
| Altman Z-score | 3.38 | 4.06 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 8 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 1.3% | 3.0% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 1.3% | 3.0% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 93.8% | 108% |
| Held by insiders | 2.1% | 1.7% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$2.9M | $879K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.6% | 8.9% |
Go deeper
- BXC stock overview
- BXC income statement
- BXC valuation and score
- SITE stock overview
- SITE income statement
- SITE valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.