BlueLinx vs Pool
BXC and POOL side by side, both in wholesale trade-durable goods. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BXC and POOL compare
Pool is the larger company, worth 15 times as much as BlueLinx ($7.7B against $498M).
Pool grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (2.9% versus 2.1% for BlueLinx).
Pool keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 7.3% compared with −0.06% at BlueLinx.
Pool pays a dividend yielding 3.0%; BlueLinx does not pay one.
Pool scores higher on the StockData Score (17 against 7 for BlueLinx), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BXC | POOL |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $498M | $7.7B |
| Share price | $63.32 | $215.78 |
| Change, 1 year | 6.1% | −13.3% |
| Change, 5 years | −14.1% | −62.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.50 | 0.96 |
| Employees | 2,160 | 6,000 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 | 17 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 19.9× |
| P/S | 0.2× (better) | 1.4× |
| P/B | 0.8× (better) | 6.3× |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.1× (better) | 15.3× |
| P/FCF | 8.6× (better) | 17.4× |
| FCF yield | 11.7% (better) | 5.7% |
| Fair value | $103.22 | $222.67 |
| Margin of safety | 38.7% (better) | 3.1% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 2.1% | 2.9% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −0.94% | 6.1% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −107% | −3.9% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −107% | −0.91% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −70.2% | 3.9% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 15.8% | 29.4% (better) |
| Operating margin | 1.2% | 10.5% (better) |
| Net margin | −0.06% | 7.3% (better) |
| FCF margin | 1.9% | 8.1% (better) |
| Return on equity | −0.31% | 30.4% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 4.8% | 18.8% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.48 (better) | 0.95 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −0.27 | 1.85 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 0.7× | – |
| Current ratio | 4.01 (better) | 2.46 |
| Altman Z-score | 3.31 | 4.75 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 3.0% |
| Payout ratio | – | 47.1% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 15 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 16.7% |
| Buyback yield | 1.6% | 4.9% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 1.6% | 7.9% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 93.8% | 112% |
| Held by insiders | 2.1% | 3.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$2.9M | $5.7M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 2 |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.9% | 10.3% |
Go deeper
- BXC stock overview
- BXC income statement
- BXC valuation and score
- POOL stock overview
- POOL income statement
- POOL valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.