BlueLinx vs Floor & Decor
BXC and FND side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BXC and FND compare
Floor & Decor is the larger company, worth 8.2 times as much as BlueLinx ($5.1B against $621M).
Floor & Decor grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (2.4% versus 2.1% for BlueLinx).
Floor & Decor keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 4.9% compared with −0.06% at BlueLinx.
Floor & Decor scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 7 for BlueLinx), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BXC | FND |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $621M | $5.1B |
| Share price | $79.03 | $47.59 |
| Change, 1 year | 16.4% | −31.1% |
| Change, 5 years | 13.9% | −64.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.46 | 1.53 |
| Employees | 2,160 | 14K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 | 13 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Growth score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Health score | 4 | 4 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 22.1× |
| P/S | 0.2× (better) | 1.1× |
| P/B | 1.0× (better) | 2.0× |
| EV/EBITDA | 7.6× (better) | 9.0× |
| P/FCF | 10.7× (better) | 24.0× |
| FCF yield | 9.3% (better) | 4.2% |
| Fair value | $104.52 | $64.99 |
| Margin of safety | 24.4% | 26.8% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 2.1% | 2.4% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −0.94% | 14.1% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −107% | 9.9% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −107% | 10.3% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −70.2% | 0.85% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 15.8% | 44.9% (better) |
| Operating margin | 1.2% | 6.4% (better) |
| Net margin | −0.06% | 4.9% (better) |
| FCF margin | 1.9% | 4.5% (better) |
| Return on equity | −0.31% | 9.7% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 4.8% | 9.9% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.48 | 0.08 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −0.27 | −0.23 |
| Interest coverage | 0.7× | – |
| Current ratio | 4.01 (better) | 1.33 |
| Altman Z-score | 3.38 (better) | 2.50 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 1.3% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 1.3% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 93.8% | 119% |
| Held by insiders | 2.1% | 1.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$2.9M (better) | −$13.7M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.6% | 13.2% |
Go deeper
- BXC stock overview
- BXC income statement
- BXC valuation and score
- FND stock overview
- FND income statement
- FND valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.