BWX Technologies vs Power Solutions International
BWXT and PSIX side by side, both in industrial and commercial machinery and computer equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BWXT and PSIX compare
BWX Technologies is the larger company, worth 11 times as much as Power Solutions International ($12.0B against $1.1B).
On earnings, Power Solutions International is cheaper: it trades at 15.5× trailing earnings, against 33.9× for BWX Technologies.
BWX Technologies grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (22.7% versus 13.2% for Power Solutions International).
BWX Technologies keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 10.1% compared with 10.0% at Power Solutions International.
BWX Technologies pays a dividend yielding 0.81%; Power Solutions International does not pay one.
BWX Technologies scores higher on the StockData Score (18 against 15 for Power Solutions International), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BWXT | PSIX |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $12.0B | $1.1B |
| Share price | $130.70 | $45.73 |
| Change, 1 year | −38.8% | −48.1% |
| Change, 5 years | 137% | 916% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.82 | 1.24 |
| Employees | 1,300 | 1,000 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 18 (better) | 15 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Growth score | 5 (better) | 3 |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Health score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 33.9× | 15.5× (better) |
| P/S | 3.4× | 1.6× (better) |
| P/B | 9.0× | 5.2× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 24.6× | 11.3× (better) |
| P/FCF | 37.8× | – |
| PEG | 3.01 | 0.13 (better) |
| FCF yield | 2.6% | – |
| Fair value | $96.24 | $48.10 |
| Margin of safety | −35.8% | 4.9% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 22.7% (better) | 13.2% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 8.5% | 11.6% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 20.7% (better) | −38.8% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 20.6% (better) | −38.7% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 4.2% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 22.1% | 23.9% (better) |
| Operating margin | 12.1% | 13.0% (better) |
| Net margin | 10.1% (better) | 10.0% |
| FCF margin | 9.0% | – |
| Return on equity | 28.2% | 40.1% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 13.0% | 45.7% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.51 | 0.03 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.59 (better) | −0.73 |
| Interest coverage | 12.4× | 13.4× (better) |
| Current ratio | 2.40 | 2.57 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 4.55 | 5.29 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.81% | – |
| Payout ratio | 27.1% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 4.8% | – |
| Buyback yield | 0.00% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 0.81% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 92.4% | 36.4% |
| Held by insiders | 0.38% | 53.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$9.0M | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.6% | 16.0% |
Go deeper
- BWXT stock overview
- BWXT income statement
- BWXT valuation and score
- PSIX stock overview
- PSIX income statement
- PSIX valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.