StockData

Betterware de Mexico, S.A.P.I. de C.V vs Pattern

BWMX and PTRN side by side, both in nonstore retailers. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How BWMX and PTRN compare

Pattern grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (42.1% versus 1.0% for Betterware de Mexico, S.A.P.I. de C.V).

Betterware de Mexico, S.A.P.I. de C.V keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 7.4% compared with 3.6% at Pattern.

Pattern scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 7 for Betterware de Mexico, S.A.P.I. de C.V), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricBWMXPTRN
Size and price
Market cap–$3.6B
Share price$17.14$20.38
Change, 1 year21.5%12.0%
Change, 5 years−31.6%–
Beta (5Y)0.801.73
Employees655K2,300
StockData Score
Total score712 (better)
Valuation score00
Growth score13 (better)
Performance score4 (better)3
Health score26 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S–1.1×
P/B–5.5×
EV/EBITDA–20.7×
P/FCF–34.1×
FCF yield–2.9%
Fair value–$16.30
Margin of safety–−25.0%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)1.0%42.1% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average14.5%–
Net income growth (TTM)49.0%1952% (better)
EPS growth (TTM)49.0%–
EPS growth, 5Y average26.8%–
Profitability
Gross margin66.6% (better)43.7%
Operating margin–4.3%
Net margin7.4% (better)3.6%
FCF margin–3.2%
Return on equity61.7% (better)19.6%
Return on invested capital–40.8%
Financial health
Debt / equity3.21 (better)0.00
Net debt / EBITDA2.56–
Current ratio1.092.32 (better)
Altman Z-score–8.83
Piotroski F-score77
Dividends and buybacks
Payout ratio80.1%–
Buyback yield–0.61%
Shareholder yield–0.61%
Ownership
Held by institutions12.9%36.4%
Held by insiders61.3%74.0%
Insider net buying, 12 months$3.7M (better)−$167M
Short interest, % of float–16.9%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.