Bowman Consulting vs TSS
BWMN and TSSI side by side, both in management and public relations services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BWMN and TSSI compare
Bowman Consulting is the larger company, worth 4.4 times as much as TSS ($745M against $170M).
Bowman Consulting grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (16.0% versus −14.2% for TSS).
TSS keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 8.4% compared with −0.22% at Bowman Consulting.
TSS scores higher on the StockData Score (19 against 10 for Bowman Consulting), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BWMN | TSSI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $745M | $170M |
| Share price | $43.00 | $6.03 |
| Change, 1 year | 1.1% | −62.7% |
| Change, 5 years | 156% | 922% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.94 | 2.05 |
| Employees | 2,300 | 286 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 | 19 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 6 (better) |
| Growth score | 5 (better) | 3 |
| Performance score | 1 | 6 (better) |
| Health score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 10.4× |
| P/S | 1.4× | 0.8× (better) |
| P/B | 2.8× | 2.1× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 18.3× | 12.6× (better) |
| P/FCF | 178× | – |
| FCF yield | 0.56% (better) | −5.1% |
| Fair value | $35.21 | $14.94 |
| Margin of safety | −22.1% | 59.6% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 16.0% (better) | −14.2% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 32.1% | 40.4% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −107% | 249% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −110% | 205% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 33.8% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 53.0% (better) | 18.3% |
| Operating margin | 2.9% | 4.5% (better) |
| Net margin | −0.22% | 8.4% (better) |
| FCF margin | 0.76% (better) | −4.3% |
| Return on equity | −0.47% | 23.3% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 4.7% | 33.0% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.06 (better) | 0.18 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.28 (better) | −3.73 |
| Current ratio | 0.91 | 1.79 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.05 | 2.67 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 2.6% (better) | 1.4% |
| Shareholder yield | 2.6% (better) | 1.4% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 63.7% | 46.3% |
| Held by insiders | 12.9% | 16.8% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$5.6M (better) | −$8.9M |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.0% | 18.1% |
Go deeper
- BWMN stock overview
- BWMN income statement
- BWMN valuation and score
- TSSI stock overview
- TSSI income statement
- TSSI valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.