Bowman Consulting vs RMR
BWMN and RMR side by side, both in management and public relations services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BWMN and RMR compare
Bowman Consulting is the larger company, worth 1.4 times as much as RMR ($745M against $537M).
Bowman Consulting grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (16.0% versus −8.2% for RMR).
RMR keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 1.7% compared with −0.22% at Bowman Consulting.
RMR pays a dividend yielding 10.7%; Bowman Consulting does not pay one.
Bowman Consulting scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 8 for RMR), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BWMN | RMR |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $745M | $537M |
| Share price | $43.00 | $16.75 |
| Change, 1 year | 1.1% | 7.4% |
| Change, 5 years | 156% | −53.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.94 | 0.76 |
| Employees | 2,300 | 50K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 (better) | 8 |
| Valuation score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 27.5× |
| P/S | 1.4× | 0.8× (better) |
| P/B | 2.8× | 2.5× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 18.3× | 11.0× (better) |
| P/FCF | 178× | – |
| FCF yield | 0.56% | – |
| Fair value | $35.21 | $16.58 |
| Margin of safety | −22.1% | −1.0% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 16.0% (better) | −8.2% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 32.1% (better) | 1.2% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −107% | −39.2% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −110% | −40.8% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 33.8% (better) | −22.3% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 53.0% | – |
| Operating margin | 2.9% | 6.4% (better) |
| Net margin | −0.22% | 1.7% (better) |
| FCF margin | 0.76% | – |
| Return on equity | −0.47% | 4.9% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 4.7% | 20.4% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.06 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.28 | – |
| Interest coverage | – | 3.5× |
| Current ratio | 0.91 | 1.69 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.05 | 3.22 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 10.7% |
| Payout ratio | – | 287% |
| Buyback yield | 2.6% (better) | 0.27% |
| Shareholder yield | 2.6% | 11.0% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 63.7% | 43.9% |
| Held by insiders | 12.9% | 2.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$5.6M | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.0% | 4.1% |
Go deeper
- BWMN stock overview
- BWMN income statement
- BWMN valuation and score
- RMR stock overview
- RMR income statement
- RMR valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.