Broadwind vs Matthews International
BWEN and MATW side by side, both in primary metal industries. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BWEN and MATW compare
Matthews International is the larger company, worth 10 times as much as Broadwind ($587M against $56.1M).
Broadwind grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (94.3% versus −31.8% for Matthews International).
Broadwind keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −2.3% compared with −2.6% at Matthews International.
Matthews International pays a dividend yielding 5.4%; Broadwind does not pay one.
Broadwind scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 8 for Matthews International), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BWEN | MATW |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $56.1M | $587M |
| Share price | $2.37 | $18.80 |
| Change, 1 year | 8.2% | −20.7% |
| Change, 5 years | −14.1% | −48.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.50 | 0.82 |
| Employees | 425 | 5,500 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 (better) | 8 |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 0.3× (better) | 0.5× |
| P/B | 0.9× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 3.2× (better) | 9.2× |
| FCF yield | −28.1% | −14.0% (better) |
| Fair value | $4.64 | – |
| Margin of safety | 48.9% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 94.3% (better) | −31.8% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −4.5% | −0.01% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −185% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −186% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 12.4% | 36.6% (better) |
| Operating margin | 3.3% | 6.3% (better) |
| Net margin | −2.3% (better) | −2.6% |
| FCF margin | −8.1% | −7.4% (better) |
| Return on equity | −6.7% | −5.7% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 9.3% (better) | 2.9% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.07 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −0.88 | 4.38 (better) |
| Interest coverage | – | 1.4× |
| Current ratio | 3.02 (better) | 1.76 |
| Altman Z-score | −1.12 | 1.90 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 5.4% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 4 |
| Buyback yield | – | 1.0% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 6.4% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 34.1% | 96.3% |
| Held by insiders | 8.0% | 10.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | $318K |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 1.9% | 18.2% |
Go deeper
- BWEN stock overview
- BWEN income statement
- BWEN valuation and score
- MATW stock overview
- MATW income statement
- MATW valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.