BorgWarner vs BRP
BWA and DOO side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BWA and DOO compare
BRP grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (6.8% versus 0.40% for BorgWarner).
BRP keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 3.5% compared with 3.4% at BorgWarner.
BorgWarner pays a dividend yielding 1.3%; BRP does not pay one.
BorgWarner scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 3 for BRP), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BWA | DOO |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $10.1B | – |
| Share price | $50.45 | $65.49 |
| Change, 1 year | 12.3% | 2.8% |
| Change, 5 years | 10.0% | −25.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.93 | 1.06 |
| Employees | 700 | – |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 13 (better) | 3 |
| Valuation score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 21.5× | – |
| P/S | 0.7× | – |
| P/B | 1.8× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 8.5× | – |
| P/FCF | 8.8× | – |
| FCF yield | 11.4% | – |
| Fair value | $47.15 | – |
| Margin of safety | −7.0% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 0.40% | 6.8% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 7.1% | 7.2% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 257% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 273% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −11.4% | −0.74% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 19.6% | 22.4% (better) |
| Operating margin | 5.4% (better) | 4.7% |
| Net margin | 3.4% | 3.5% (better) |
| FCF margin | 8.1% | 10.8% (better) |
| Return on equity | 8.2% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 6.4% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.53 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.03 (better) | 5.05 |
| Interest coverage | 8.7× (better) | 1.9× |
| Current ratio | 1.41 (better) | 1.27 |
| Altman Z-score | 3.03 | – |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.3% | – |
| Payout ratio | 29.1% | 21.6% |
| Years of dividend growth | 1 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | −3.8% | – |
| Buyback yield | 7.1% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 8.5% | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 107% | 41.5% |
| Held by insiders | 0.87% | 41.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$16.1M | – |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.0% | – |
Go deeper
- BWA stock overview
- BWA income statement
- BWA valuation and score
- DOO stock overview
- DOO income statement
- DOO valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.