StockData

Buenaventura Mining vs Ferroglobe

BVN and GSM side by side, both in materials. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How BVN and GSM compare

Buenaventura Mining grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (50.0% versus −18.8% for Ferroglobe).

Buenaventura Mining keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 45.2% compared with −12.8% at Ferroglobe.

Buenaventura Mining scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 3 for Ferroglobe), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricBVNGSM
Size and price
Share price$24.83$3.00
Change, 1 year5.6%−20.6%
Change, 5 years265%−50.1%
Beta (5Y)0.561.28
Employees3,29515
StockData Score
Total score9 (better)3
Valuation score00
Growth score3 (better)0
Performance score4 (better)0
Health score23 (better)
Dividend score00
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)50.0% (better)−18.8%
Revenue growth, 5Y average20.7% (better)3.1%
Net income growth (TTM)94.2% (better)−825%
EPS growth (TTM)93.7% (better)−858%
Profitability
Gross margin45.2%–
Operating margin36.6% (better)−10.0%
Net margin45.2% (better)−12.8%
FCF margin6.0% (better)−0.77%
Return on equity21.0% (better)−25.9%
Return on invested capital17.0% (better)−16.8%
Financial health
Debt / equity–0.24
Interest coverage7.3× (better)−6.4×
Current ratio2.01 (better)1.66
Piotroski F-score8 (better)3
Dividends and buybacks
Payout ratio15.7%–
Ownership
Held by institutions44.5%56.6%
Held by insiders1.1%36.8%
Insider net buying, 12 months–$324K
Short interest, % of float–4.7%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.