StockData

Buenaventura Mining vs Ero Copper

BVN and ERO side by side, both in materials. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How BVN and ERO compare

Ero Copper grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (67.1% versus 50.0% for Buenaventura Mining).

Buenaventura Mining keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 45.2% compared with 33.6% at Ero Copper.

Ero Copper scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 9 for Buenaventura Mining), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricBVNERO
Size and price
Share price$24.83$29.06
Change, 1 year5.6%27.6%
Change, 5 years265%59.7%
Beta (5Y)0.561.37
Employees3,295–
StockData Score
Total score914 (better)
Valuation score00
Growth score34 (better)
Performance score46 (better)
Health score24 (better)
Dividend score00
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)50.0%67.1% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average20.7% (better)19.4%
Net income growth (TTM)94.2%–
EPS growth (TTM)93.7%–
EPS growth, 5Y average–35.2%
Profitability
Gross margin45.2% (better)43.9%
Operating margin36.6% (better)34.4%
Net margin45.2% (better)33.6%
FCF margin6.0%16.8% (better)
Return on equity21.0%34.6% (better)
Return on invested capital17.0% (better)16.9%
Financial health
Debt / equity–0.65
Net debt / EBITDA–1.30
Interest coverage7.3×8.1× (better)
Current ratio2.01 (better)1.06
Piotroski F-score88
Dividends and buybacks
Payout ratio15.7%–
Ownership
Held by institutions44.5%67.3%
Held by insiders1.1%0.00%
Short interest, % of float–6.3%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.