BrightView vs SiteOne Landscape Supply
BV and SITE side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BV and SITE compare
SiteOne Landscape Supply is the larger company, worth 5.4 times as much as BrightView ($4.9B against $914M).
SiteOne Landscape Supply grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (2.9% versus 1.5% for BrightView).
SiteOne Landscape Supply keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 3.5% compared with 0.04% at BrightView.
SiteOne Landscape Supply scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 5 for BrightView), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BV | SITE |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $914M | $4.9B |
| Share price | $9.87 | $114.25 |
| Change, 1 year | −16.9% | −7.7% |
| Change, 5 years | −36.0% | −54.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.05 | 1.39 |
| Employees | 18K | 8,200 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 5 | 13 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Health score | 3 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 30.1× |
| P/S | 0.3× (better) | 1.0× |
| P/B | 0.7× (better) | 2.9× |
| EV/EBITDA | 24.1× | 20.2× (better) |
| P/FCF | – | 19.8× |
| FCF yield | −4.4% | 5.1% (better) |
| Fair value | $3.59 | $101.86 |
| Margin of safety | −175% | −12.2% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 1.5% | 2.9% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 1.2% | 11.7% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −98.2% | 20.5% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −385% | 23.4% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 4.2% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 20.4% | 35.3% (better) |
| Operating margin | 2.8% | 5.5% (better) |
| Net margin | 0.04% | 3.5% (better) |
| FCF margin | −1.5% | 5.2% (better) |
| Return on equity | 0.08% | 9.9% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 1.8% | 9.8% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.72 | 0.28 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 11.84 | 1.47 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 1.4× | 7.4× (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.29 | 2.41 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.23 | 4.29 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 8 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 6.1% (better) | 4.3% |
| Shareholder yield | 6.1% (better) | 4.3% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 103% | 110% |
| Held by insiders | 26.2% | 1.8% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $316K | $2.1M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 6.1% | 8.4% |
Go deeper
- BV stock overview
- BV income statement
- BV valuation and score
- SITE stock overview
- SITE income statement
- SITE valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.