StockData

Burford Capital vs Strategy

BUR and MSTR side by side, both in finance services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How BUR and MSTR compare

Strategy grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (4.2% versus −402% for Burford Capital).

Strategy scores higher on the StockData Score (4 against 1 for Burford Capital), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricBURMSTR
Size and price
Market cap–$47.0B
Share price$3.65$122.35
Change, 1 year−59.4%−48.8%
Change, 5 years−65.6%70.3%
Beta (5Y)1.182.15
Employees1721,539
StockData Score
Total score14 (better)
Valuation score00
Growth score1 (better)0
Performance score01 (better)
Health score03 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S–95.0×
P/B–0.8×
FCF yield–−0.02%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−402%4.2% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average4.7% (better)−0.15%
Net income growth (TTM)−1987%−273% (better)
EPS growth (TTM)−2079%–
EPS growth, 5Y average−15.5%–
Profitability
Gross margin–67.8%
Operating margin–−3906%
Net margin–−2760%
FCF margin–−2.2%
Return on equity−98.3%−25.4% (better)
Return on invested capital−102%−26.2% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity–0.12
Interest coverage−7.4×–
Current ratio–4.04
Altman Z-score–2.58
Piotroski F-score23 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Years of dividend growth0–
Buyback yield–−38.4%
Shareholder yield–−38.4%
Ownership
Held by institutions69.4%54.8%
Held by insiders5.5%0.15%
Insider net buying, 12 months–−$29.3M
Superinvestors holding11
Short interest, % of float7.1%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.