Buda Juice vs Willamette Valley Vineyards
BUDA and WVVI side by side, both in beverages. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BUDA and WVVI compare
Buda Juice is the larger company, worth 11 times as much as Willamette Valley Vineyards ($90.5M against $8.3M).
Buda Juice grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (11.8% versus −1.6% for Willamette Valley Vineyards).
Buda Juice keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 28.0% compared with −5.9% at Willamette Valley Vineyards.
Buda Juice scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 5 for Willamette Valley Vineyards), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BUDA | WVVI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $90.5M | $8.3M |
| Share price | $7.20 | $1.66 |
| Change, 1 year | – | −36.6% |
| Change, 5 years | – | −88.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | – | 0.24 |
| Employees | 39 | 158 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 (better) | 5 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 36.0× | – |
| P/S | 7.2× | 0.2× (better) |
| P/B | 4.2× | 0.1× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 19.6× (better) | 101× |
| P/FCF | 31.2× | 13.2× (better) |
| FCF yield | 3.2% | 7.6% (better) |
| Fair value | $5.63 | $16.36 |
| Margin of safety | −27.9% | 89.9% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 11.8% (better) | −1.6% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 6.4% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −1.1% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 0.00% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 44.6% | 59.1% (better) |
| Operating margin | 27.4% (better) | −7.9% |
| Net margin | 28.0% (better) | −5.9% |
| FCF margin | 23.0% (better) | 1.7% |
| Return on equity | 28.5% (better) | −3.3% |
| Return on invested capital | 113% (better) | −2.9% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.03 (better) | 0.22 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −4.90 | 63.19 (better) |
| Interest coverage | – | −2.6× |
| Current ratio | 15.21 (better) | 2.92 |
| Altman Z-score | 27.13 (better) | 0.83 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 3.1% | 11.0% |
| Held by insiders | 67.9% | 27.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | $90.2K |
| Short interest, % of float | 0.08% | – |
Go deeper
- BUDA stock overview
- BUDA income statement
- BUDA valuation and score
- WVVI stock overview
- WVVI income statement
- WVVI valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.